|
|
|
| NEWS > 30 November 2006 |
Other related articles:
Corruption probe fell short, s
On the advice of Crown prosecutors, only six of 12 drug-squad officers suspected of breaking the law were charged, document alleges
The biggest probe of police corruption allegations in Canadian history charged only half of the officers who were suspected of breaking the law, The Globe and Mail has learned.
Six Toronto police officers faced 22 criminal charges when the probe - headed by then-staff-superintendent John Neily of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police - wrapped up in January of 2004.
According to sources familiar with the "final report," which w... Read more
|
 Article sourced from
|
|
NEWS.com.au - Australia
30 November 2006
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.
|
|
Family dog tied to tree, shot
TWO policemen have not been prosecuted for shooting a dog after tying it to a tree.
An inquiry recommended the men be summonsed under the Animal Welfare Act.
But police last night said the officers had been subjected only to "internal disciplinary action". The first officer fired at the family pet from close range but missed.
A shot from the second officer passed through the dog's neck - depriving it of the ability to bark - and cut the rope.
The animal ran home to its master with blood pumping out of the entry and exit bullet wounds.
Ombudsman Carolyn Richards, who investigates complaints against Territory Government departments, said she was "appalled". Dog-owning Police Minister Chris Burns said he was also appalled.
The incident happened after police in an unnamed "remote locality" went to a house to arrest a man's son on an outstanding warrant.
A struggle started and the family dog bit one of the officers. The police decided the dog was a "vicious animal" and should be put down.
The owners said the officers did not fully explain that they were going to kill the animal and they were "coerced" into letting them take it away.
The dog was taken into the bush, tied to a tree and shot. After the first shot, the pet was "jumping all over the place".
The police found out that the dog had returned home, but decided against seizing it again.
The Joint Review Committee - made up of police and staff from the Ombudsman's office - investigated the case and found the officers had made "misleading" statements and been inhumane.
It recommended internal disciplinary action and prosecution.
|
| |
 EiP Comments:
|
|---|
|
| |
* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
 |
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications |
|
| |
|
