Username:
 Password:
 

Are you not a member?
Register here
Forgot your password?
 
 
 
 
 
 



NEWS > 10 January 2007

Other related articles:

Nigerian police a threat to pu
Nigerian police are a danger to public safety because they consider extra-judicial killings an acceptable policing method and raping women as a fringe benefit, a report by a Nigerian civil rights group said.

The Network on Police Reform in Nigeria (NOPRIN) said it had monitored 400 police stations in 13 states for a year and found that killings, torture, extortion and rape had become routine because the authorities shielded policemen from the law.

The findings, reported in Nigerian newspapers on Monday, come after chief of police Mike Okiro said last month his men had kil... Read more

 Article sourced from

Main Street Newspapers - Jeffe
10 January 2007
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.


Commerce Police Sergeant Fired

A Commerce police sergeant was fired Dec. 16 for allegedly stealing $300 in cash from an undocumented immigrant.

Sgt. Larry Floyd was named in a complaint filed Oct. 30 alleging “criminal misconduct” against a private citizen, Police Chief John W. Gaissert confirmed.

The investigation of Floyd continues. According to Gaissert, the internal investigation has been completed, but the summarizing report will be made public Jan. 15.

The complaint apparently alleged that Floyd stole the money from an undocumented Mexican immigrant’s wallet following a traffic accident. Gaissert, the Georgia Bureau of Investigation and the district attorney’s office reached the conclusion that the case was not strong enough to pursue criminal charges, the police chief said.
The investigation began after the Hispanic male came forward and filed the complaint.
“You have two choices (with which to proceed) once you have an allegation,” Gaissert said. “You can pursue it administratively under what is called the ‘Garrity Rule,’ which is based on case law that established guidelines of due process for police in administrative investigations, or you can conduct it (as a criminal investigation).”

In the latter scenario, the officer is treated like any other criminal suspect and, for example, can refuse to talk. In the former case, any statements made by the officer may be used only for departmental investigation purposes and not for the prosecution of a criminal offense, but the officer can be compelled to take a lie detector test.

“You’ve got to make that choice,” Gaissert said. “If you think you’ve got a (prosecutable) criminal case, you would pursue it that way. Otherwise, you go under Garrity.” In this case, Gaissert indicated, the language barrier and the lack of physical evidence or witnesses led to proceeding under the Garrity Rule.
Other sources indicated that the complainant and Floyd were subjected to polygraph tests. The victim passed the test, while the police officer failed it, the sources said.

The Peace Offices Standards and Training (POST) Council is also getting involved. That is the organization that certifies peace officers in Georgia, and its interest is in protecting the integrity of the organization through enforcement of its standards.
“POST assigns an investigator. He comes in, takes the internal affairs record and all documentation developed by the agency and does his own investigation,” Gaissert said.

The results of that can range from POST taking no action to suspending, probating or revoking POST certification, which is required for service as a police officer in Georgia. That investigation has not been completed in Floyd’s case.
“I take this kind of allegation very seriously,” Gaissert said. “We received the complaint, we took it seriously, we investigated it and we took decisive action.”

The police chief said that Floyd was a “technically competent officer” who was “well liked in the community and had a good working relationship with other officers.” Floyd was also reported to have been in the midst of a divorce.

PERSONNEL FILE
Floyd’s personnel file appeared fairly typical. It contained several letters of commendation, but also a notice of a three-day suspension, a demotion and a pay cut in 2004 stemming from his having his wife report him too sick to work - after which he went to see a performance of “Larry the Cable Guy.” It also contained a reprimand related to a few bounced checks.
 

EiP Comments:

 


* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.


 
 
[about EiP] [membership] [information room] [library] [online shopping]
[EiP services] [contact information]
 
 
Policing Research 2010 EthicsinPolicing Limited. All rights reserved International Policing
privacy policy

site designed, maintained & hosted by
The Consultancy
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications