|
|
|
| NEWS > 02 December 2007 |
Other related articles:
St. Helena Police Jury head pa
DENHAM SPRINGS — The St. Helena Parish Police Jury president has paid a $1,000 fine to the state Board of Ethics for voting in June 2004 to have the parish pay for lumber purchases from his brother’s company, the police juror said Thursday.
Charles Davis said he paid the fine about two months ago as part of a joint agreement with the board. The agreement, called a consent opinion, was made public earlier this week. The board approved it a week ago Thursday, a board attorney said.
The opinion says the board found Davis and the company broke the state ethics code. The board... Read more
|
 Article sourced from
|
|
Stamford Advocate - Stamford,C
02 December 2007
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.
|
New Canaan Police Department,
|
New Canaan police review ethic
Eleven New Canaan police officers crossed an ethical line when they accepted discounted service from an alarm company, but the subsequent investigation reveals confusion about where that line was drawn.
Some of the officers said they believed the deals the company cut were common knowledge. Officers as high-ranking as a lieutenant accepted the service, they said.
In interviews, the officers mentioned other businesses that offered discounts to police.
New Canaan Police Chief Edward Nadriczny concluded that the officers' confusion arose because the department's Manual of Conduct and Discipline does not have a section dealing specifically with gifts. The police commission ruled in October that each officer who received the gifts would receive a written reprimand. Five officers are appealing the ruling to the state Labor Board, which is expected to take several months to render a decision.
Ethical concerns are more likely to arise when individual officers make arrangements with citizens or businesses; not all gifts or discounts are compromising, Nadriczny said.
A box of cookies dropped off for the department or a discount for law enforcement as a class, like those offered to senior citizens or teachers, is acceptable when there is no expectation of a favor in return, he said.
Luis Lopez, owner of the restaurant Chef Luis in New Canaan, reduces the tab for firefighters, police, emergency services personnel and charities' employees.
"Basically, we are trying to give back to the community," Lopez said. "I get pulled over like anybody else."
The alarm company had no set policy and the deals varied widely, though the exact values could not be determined.
Nadriczny plans to update the rules, but said he could not provide specifics until the changes are finalized.
His department is accredited every three years by the Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies, a national organization. A department must have a code of conduct to become accredited, but the specifics of that code are determined by the department and its community, said James Brown, associate director of the commission. About 1,000 departments nationwide are accredited by the commission or are working toward it.
The Greenwich Police Department, which is not accredited, forbids gifts or discounts, said Lt. Daniel Allen, a department spokesman.
In Stamford, departmental rules and the town's ethics ordinance leave room for discretion by forbidding the acceptance of gifts from anyone who might later seek preferential treatment.
The town sets a ceiling of $50, but the department forbids accepting any gift for a service rendered in the line of duty.
Sometimes a person just wants to do something nice, and an officer must judge the intentions behind a gift, said Sgt. Joseph Kennedy, police union president.
"You leave it to common sense," he said. "You know what is right and wrong."
The police investigation does little to clarify the intentions of New Canaan Alarm Company's owner, Paul Chludzinski.
Chludzinski initially denied that he mentioned his police customers to other potential buyers. Later, he told an investigator, "I can say whatever I want."
The investigation also mentions that portions of a thank you letter written by an officer appeared on the company's Web site.
|
| |
 EiP Comments:
|
|---|
|
| |
* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
 |
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications |
|
| |
|
